{"id":126467,"date":"2025-12-09T08:51:13","date_gmt":"2025-12-09T13:51:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/?p=126467"},"modified":"2025-12-09T11:50:30","modified_gmt":"2025-12-09T16:50:30","slug":"global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Global Corruption, Local Hypocrisy: The Promises and Pitfalls of the U.S. Combating Global Corruption Act"},"content":{"rendered":"

The United States has long evaluated other governments\u2019 efforts on a wide range of important issues. Yet Congress has directed the executive branch to judge others on a new front \u2014 curbing corruption \u2014 at a moment when the Trump administration is weakening many of the country’s anti-corruption safeguards and its credibility on these issues is increasingly in question. That tension matters acutely: this month, the State Department must issue its first-ever assessments of foreign anti-corruption efforts required under the recently enacted <\/span>Combating Global Corruption Act<\/span><\/a>. The forthcoming rollout will test whether the United States can still offer clear-eyed evaluations of anti-corruption efforts abroad at a moment when its own safeguards are eroding.<\/span><\/p>\n

U.S. Global Evaluations Expand to Anti-Corruption Efforts Abroad<\/b><\/h2>\n

Per legislative mandates, the U.S. State Department reports publicly and to Congress on how foreign governments meet international and U.S. standards on a range of issues, such as human rights, trafficking in persons, and investment climate. These assessments inform government decision-making, business investments, academic research, and civil society advocacy.<\/span><\/p>\n

In August, the Trump administration released its <\/span>first installment<\/span><\/a> of the annual human rights reports, a State Department publication that has been produced for decades. <\/span>The release was <\/span>widely<\/span><\/a> criticized<\/span><\/a> for a lack of candor about certain allied countries (including <\/span>El Salvador<\/span><\/a> and <\/span>Hungary<\/span><\/a>), the omission of key issues (such as <\/span>discrimination<\/span><\/a>), and the unwillingness of senior leadership to promote the reports. That precedent now casts a long shadow over the forthcoming first-ever iteration of annual reports the State Department is required to produce under the recently enacted <\/span>Combating Global Corruption Act<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Act, passed in 2023, requires the State Department to report annually to Congress and the public on foreign government efforts to counter corruption, beginning this month. While the Act has not received much public attention, it has the potential to help promote progress and check backsliding on an issue that regularly harms American interests globally.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Yet, as this <\/span>Just Security<\/span><\/i> series<\/span><\/a> has shown, the United States is facing a moment when its credibility in countering corruption \u2014 and weighing in on the efforts of others \u2014 is under strain. In its foreign and domestic policies, the Trump administration has undermined or terminated a wide range of U.S. anti-corruption initiatives. This comes on top of a longer history of bipartisan concern about <\/span>influence peddling<\/span><\/a> and the extensive<\/span> role of money<\/span><\/a> in U.S. politics, among other issues.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Beyond the general issue of U.S. credibility, two challenges warrant particular attention. First, the integrity of the reports could be tainted by political interference or inadequate department resourcing. Second, the Act\u2019s potential will be undermined if the reports are not followed by corresponding policy actions like appropriate sanctions or training for U.S. officials.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Nonetheless, Congress and civil society should embrace the Act as a framework and a tool among many for reviewing the state of anti-corruption efforts globally, critically evaluating the U.S. government\u2019s own adherence to the Act\u2019s standards, and supporting those who are calling for reform.<\/span><\/p>\n

A Potentially Impactful Reporting Scheme<\/b><\/h2>\n

Prior to 2025, the United States had recently taken modest but meaningful steps to counter corruption at home and globally. It often did so with strong bipartisan support, based on the understanding that fighting corruption would pay dividends for national security, economic prosperity, and human rights. Recent high-profile initiatives included implementation of the <\/span>Global Magnitsky Act<\/span><\/a> and <\/span>Corporate Transparency Act<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>ethics pledges by executive branch officials<\/span><\/a>, and the creation and execution of the <\/span>U.S. Strategy on Countering Corruption<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Combating Global Corruption Act aimed at building on this progress. The bill was a top priority for then-Senator Ben Cardin, who secured the Biden administration\u2019s support as one of his first acts when he became chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in September 2023. This was a fitting choice, since it was a federal indictment for <\/span>bribery<\/span><\/a> and other corrupt acts that drove Cardin\u2019s predecessor out of that chairmanship. After receiving <\/span>unanimous support<\/span><\/a> in committee \u2013 including from then-Senator Marco Rubio \u2013 and the full Senate, Cardin\u2019s legislation became law in <\/span>December 2023<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Act\u2019s main feature is to require the State Department, by December 22 and for seven years thereafter, to assess and report to Congress and the public regarding foreign governments that are \u201csustaining or making good progress on anti-corruption efforts.\u201d The State Department must also provide a classified report to Congress on foreign governments \u201cmaking limited to no effort\u2026and no meaningful progress on combating corruption.\u201d These assessments are to be based on a list of standards and criteria rooted in historical U.S. anti-corruption approaches and international treaties that the United States has ratified. The standards focus on criminalization of corruption, enforcement of the law, and prevention efforts.<\/span><\/p>\n

In an earlier draft form, the Act was modeled on the State Department\u2019s annual country reports on trafficking in persons (TIP), which publicly rank all countries in three tiers <\/span>based on the extent<\/span><\/a> of each government\u2019s efforts to eliminate trafficking. By many <\/span>accounts<\/span><\/a>, the public stigma of a negative TIP ranking or the threat of one have been impactful in spurring foreign governments into improving their record. These reports have also included a self-assessment of the U.S. government\u2019s record.<\/span><\/p>\n

As enacted, the <\/span>Combating Global Corruption Act<\/span><\/a> does not require a ranking of all countries, nor the publication of any critical assessments. Still, the Act provides an opportunity for the State Department to highlight which foreign governments are sustaining or making steps in accordance with the Act\u2019s standards. If done well, this \u201cgood performance\u201d list could reward strong anti-corruption efforts. This structure allows the U.S. government to at least indirectly highlight, by omission from the good performance list, which governments are not making or sustaining good progress. The Act also requires the State Department to provide Congress a <\/span>classified list<\/span><\/a> with more information on the \u201cpoor performance\u201d governments.<\/span><\/p>\n

The assessments underpinning both lists should inform U.S. policy formulation and action, and to that end, the Act mandates certain <\/span>follow-up actions<\/span><\/a>. First, the U.S. government must consider imposing targeted Global Magnitsky sanctions on individuals and entities in countries on the classified poor performance list and report any such action. Second, for each country on the poor performance list, the State Department must designate and train a U.S. Embassy point of contact responsible for promoting the implementation of a whole-of-U.S. government anti-corruption approach in that country. Finally, while the Act does not require a formal self-assessment of the U.S. record like the TIP report, it does call for \u201can annual update in a classified setting [to Congress]…on the United States Government\u2019s efforts to fight against corruption.\u201d It is unclear whether the Trump administration will provide any public update given that the statute only requires the update to be made to Congress.<\/span><\/p>\n

In the Background: U.S. Actions on Anti-Corruption\u00a0<\/b><\/h2>\n

The impact of any U.S. praise or criticism on anti-corruption abroad will depend heavily on the U.S. government\u2019s credibility on the issue. Some U.S. shortcomings on anti-corruption are not new, of course, as reflected by longstanding criticisms of the <\/span>campaign finance system<\/span><\/a>, the<\/span> Supreme Court\u2019s narrowing<\/span><\/a> of the application of anti-bribery laws, or unheeded calls to <\/span>ban the trading of individual stocks<\/span><\/a> by legislators. This year, several Trump administration actions defy a number of the benchmarks that the Act outlines as indicators of foreign government efforts to address corruption. For example:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2022 \u201cVigorously investigate, prosecute, convict, and sentence public officials who participate in or facilitate corruption\u201d <\/span><\/i>and <\/span>\u201cconvict and sentence persons responsible for\u2026 acts [of corruption].\u201d<\/span><\/i> So far, President Trump has <\/span>pardoned<\/span><\/a> a large and growing number of corrupt politicians and business leaders, signaling tolerance for corruption rather than concern about it. The Administration has also <\/span>dropped<\/span><\/a> bribery charges against a sitting mayor that it concedes are well-founded and <\/span>slashed its own capacity<\/span><\/a> to bring such cases. It has significantly <\/span>narrowed<\/span><\/a> the scope of enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Furthermore, President Trump has publicly demanded the Justice Department <\/span>indict his political foes<\/span><\/a>, casting doubt on the legitimacy of the actions DOJ takes.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2022 <\/span>\u201cAdopted measures to prevent corruption…\u201d <\/span><\/i>An <\/span>international expert review<\/span><\/a> recently expressed concern that the President and Vice President have long been exempt from certain legal provisions on conflict of interest and integrity, highlighting the need for these leaders to voluntarily address these concerns. Exacerbating this problem, President Trump in January <\/span>revoked a Biden Administration ethics pledge requirement<\/span><\/a> for all political appointees without instituting a replacement. The administration has largely fired the corps of inspectors general whom Congress has charged with preventing and combating waste, fraud, and abuse within executive branch agencies, despite <\/span>congressional attempts to strengthen their independence<\/span><\/a>. The Administration also <\/span>withheld funding<\/span><\/a> for the body that coordinates among and provides guidance for inspectors general, only <\/span>relenting following engagement from Congress<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2022 <\/span>\u201cTake steps to implement financial transparency measures,\u201d including \u201cbeneficial ownership transparency requirements.\u201d<\/span><\/i> The Treasury Department announced in March that it <\/span>would not enforce a brand-new rule<\/span><\/a> creating a registry that would identify the true, \u201cbeneficial\u201d owners of shell companies in the United States. This reform is specifically required by the 2020 Corporate Transparency Act and had been <\/span>called<\/span><\/a> \u201cthe single-greatest anti-corruption step the U.S. had taken in decades,\u201d given its potential to reveal a wide range of corrupt and illegal acts.<\/span><\/p>\n

Beyond these concerns with domestic anti-corruption issues, the administration has dramatically reduced longstanding U.S. efforts to counter corruption globally, such as by decreasing communication about anti-corruption policy, cutting staff, and scaling back anti-corruption foreign assistance. In contrast to past administrations, including <\/span>Trump\u2019s first term<\/span><\/a>, Trump\u2019s recently-released <\/span>National Security Strategy<\/span><\/a> does not mention corruption once. Several additional domestic and foreign policy actions are detailed in <\/span>Just Security\u2019s<\/span><\/i> Anti-Corruption Tracker<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Next Steps After the Act is Published<\/b><\/h2>\n

In advance of the first Combating Global Corruption Act reports due this month, members of Congress, civil society groups, and private sector stakeholders should consider four lines of effort for holding the administration accountable for implementing the Act and its standards effectively.<\/span><\/p>\n

1) Scrutinize the reports, amplify conclusions that are credible, and highlight conclusions that are not<\/b>. In reviewing the reports, observers should specifically examine:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2022 Whether the determinations are insulated from political pressure<\/span>: Look for indications that decisions are being shaped by personal alliances or domestic politics rather than objective criteria. This could be identified by signs of the U.S. government awarding unearned praise to friendly governments or omitting progress by political adversaries. Congress should also review the classified reports for any unmerited exclusion of political allies or inclusion of political foes.<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2022 Whether the process is adequately staffed and resourced<\/span>: Thin staffing or limited expertise can weaken the underlying analysis and erode the report\u2019s credibility. The Department should share information with Congress about how it resourced the report-writing process. If it does not, Congress should require this information.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2022 <\/span>Whether the evaluations reflect rigorous technical assessment<\/span>: Determinations should be grounded in well-supported reviews by U.S. experts at embassies and in Washington. This means justifications should accurately outline how the governments do or do not adhere with the standards laid out in the law.<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a02) Track the Act\u2019s Implementation<\/b>: Following the completion of the reports, the value of the State Department\u2019s analysis and determinations will diminish if it does not effectively implement the Act\u2019s requirements for considering sanctions and designating and training key U.S. embassy personnel. The Trump administration has been <\/span>lifting<\/span><\/a> sanctions<\/span><\/a> on corrupt actors, rather than imposing them, making it hard to be optimistic on that count.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Stakeholders should track any sanctions that appear linked to the reports and urge additional action where appropriate. Further, Congress should conduct oversight on whether the Department is properly deploying sanctions for countries on the classified poor performance list and how the Department is approaching training. Finally, the administration should use its discretion to publicize its views on governments that are not meeting the standards, wherever constructive, and more generally should use the reports to inform policy decisions.<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

3) Strengthen the Combating Global Corruption Act itself.<\/b> For example, Congress could amend the Act to require the State Department to brief Congress in a public forum on its findings and efforts. The Act could also provide more specific guidance on the training required for points of contact at U.S. embassies. Some technical clarifications would be helpful, too, including specifying the reporting period to be covered and confirming that the good performance list should include governments maintaining a good status quo or making or sustaining progress.<\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>Separately, several members of Congress <\/span>proposed a version<\/span><\/a> of the CGCA earlier this year that would institute a tiered review for all countries, as the Act was originally designed. If Congress considers this new bill, which would require all of the State Department\u2019s rankings to be public, it should still allow the Department to submit supplemental information or analysis on a classified basis, as needed. It should also include an explicit requirement that the U.S. government assess itself on the Act\u2019s standards, akin to the TIP report.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a04) Urge the Trump administration (and future administrations) to adhere to the standards in the Act and articulate how it is doing so.<\/b> If it does not, civil society and Congress should use the Act\u2019s framework to spotlight U.S. strengths and weaknesses. Leading senators and representatives should hold hearings asking U.S. officials why they have stopped practices that Congress rightly and unanimously urged on other countries through the Act. If committee chairs are not willing to convene hearings, other leading members can and should host <\/span>shadow hearings<\/span><\/a> aimed at illustrating the costs of U.S. backsliding and spotlighting those harmed by corruption. The hearings could include U.S. constituents whose elected representatives have been compromised by bribery or other corrupt acts; U.S. companies that have faced bribe demands when doing business abroad; and human rights defenders and other advocates from other countries who still want U.S. partnership to fight graft and impunity.<\/span><\/p>\n

Rebuilding the U.S. government\u2019s anti-corruption practices and making them more durable over the long term will require demand from political leaders and Americans across the country. The Combating Global Corruption Act presents an imperfect but useful opportunity for anti-corruption advocates to keep making the case for why such a fight, at home and abroad, is essential.<\/span><\/p>\n

Author’s Note: Sky Miller previously served as a civil servant at the State Department, where he worked on early implementation of the Combating Global Corruption Act before being separated in a reduction in force under the Trump administration.\u00a0<\/span><\/i><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Combating Global Corruption Act presents an imperfect but useful opportunity to rebuild the U.S. government\u2019s anti-corruption practices.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3436,"featured_media":126677,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,43212,43213,2763,35,405,2716],"tags":[1785,2423,1517,217,2636,43493],"coauthors":[43657,2787],"class_list":["post-126467","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-congress","category-democracy-rule-of-law","category-democratic-backsliding-solutions","category-diplomacy","category-pipeline-a","category-international-justice","category-rule-of-law","tag-congress","tag-corruption","tag-democracy","tag-diplomacy","tag-rule-of-law","tag-guardails-anti-corruption-seires"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nPromises and Pitfalls of the \u201cU.S. Combating Global Corruption Act<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Combating Global Corruption Act presents an imperfect but useful opportunity to rebuild the U.S. government's anti-corruption practices.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Promises and Pitfalls of the \u201cU.S. Combating Global Corruption Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Combating Global Corruption Act presents an imperfect but useful opportunity to rebuild the U.S. government's anti-corruption practices.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Just Security\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JSBlog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-09T13:51:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-12-09T16:50:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/GettyImages-858343628.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Schuyler Miller, Adam Keith\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Promises and Pitfalls of the \u201cU.S. Combating Global Corruption Act\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"The Combating Global Corruption Act presents an imperfect but useful opportunity to rebuild the U.S. government's anti-corruption practices.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@just_security\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@just_security\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Schuyler Miller, Adam Keith\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Schuyler Miller\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/#\/schema\/person\/9b0b1dba7ec01b850abd35687e773f6c\"},\"headline\":\"Global Corruption, Local Hypocrisy: The Promises and Pitfalls of the U.S. Combating Global Corruption Act\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-09T13:51:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-09T16:50:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/\"},\"wordCount\":2451,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/GettyImages-858343628.jpg?fit=1920%2C1280&ssl=1\",\"keywords\":[\"Congress\",\"Corruption\",\"Democracy\",\"Diplomacy\",\"Rule of Law\",\"When Guardrails Erode: An Anti\u2011Corruption Series\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Congress\",\"Democracy & Rule of Law\",\"Democratic Backsliding & Solutions\",\"Diplomacy\",\"International and Foreign\",\"International Justice\",\"Rule of Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/\",\"name\":\"Promises and Pitfalls of the \u201cU.S. Combating Global Corruption Act\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/GettyImages-858343628.jpg?fit=1920%2C1280&ssl=1\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-09T13:51:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-09T16:50:30+00:00\",\"description\":\"The Combating Global Corruption Act presents an imperfect but useful opportunity to rebuild the U.S. government's anti-corruption practices.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/GettyImages-858343628.jpg?fit=1920%2C1280&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/GettyImages-858343628.jpg?fit=1920%2C1280&ssl=1\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1280,\"caption\":\"The Department of State in Washington, D.C. (via Getty Images)\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Global Corruption, Local Hypocrisy: The Promises and Pitfalls of the U.S. Combating Global Corruption Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/\",\"name\":\"Just Security\",\"description\":\"A Forum on Law, Rights, and U.S. National Security\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Just Security\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/just-security-logo-wordmark-font2.png?fit=5371%2C1757&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/just-security-logo-wordmark-font2.png?fit=5371%2C1757&ssl=1\",\"width\":5371,\"height\":1757,\"caption\":\"Just Security\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JSBlog\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/just_security\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/just-security-linkedin\/\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/justsecurityforum\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@JustSecurityForum\",\"https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/justsecurity.org\"],\"description\":\"Just Security is an editorially independent, non-partisan, daily digital law and policy journal that elevates the discourse on national security, democracy and the rule of law, and rights. We publish rigorous, expert analysis and informational resources on the issues that matter most. Our goals are to inform and empower decision-makers with high-quality analysis, foster informed dialogue on challenging issues, and remain accessible to our global audience. Just Security is an essential resource for those shaping a just and secure world. Just Security is based at the Reiss Center on Law and Security at New York University School of Law.\",\"email\":\"info@justsecurity.org\",\"legalName\":\"Just Security\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/#\/schema\/person\/9b0b1dba7ec01b850abd35687e773f6c\",\"name\":\"Schuyler Miller\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/107fc67fbe4c3ed7a444d1ad66379051\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5b780fe18e391c5ed9090431c427c5dbd48f71179d58ddc82a548fb8b84a9cdf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5b780fe18e391c5ed9090431c427c5dbd48f71179d58ddc82a548fb8b84a9cdf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Schuyler Miller\"},\"description\":\"Schuyler Miller (LinkedIn\u00a0\u2013\u00a0\u00a0Substack) was career civil servant in the U.S. State Department before being laid off in September 2025. He most recently served as a Policy Advisor for the State Department's Coordinator on Global Anti-Corruption. As a Presidential Management Fellow (PMF), he held roles in the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs's Office of Knowledge Management and Office of Global Programs and Policy, as well as the U.S. Agency for International Development's Anti-Corruption Task Force and Center of Excellence on Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance. Before his time in government, he worked for the National Endowment for Democracy\u2019s World Movement for Democracy. He received his MSc in International Politics as a Mitchell Scholar at Trinity College Dublin and a BA in Government and Foreign Affairs with honors from the University of Virginia.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/author\/millerschuyler\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Promises and Pitfalls of the \u201cU.S. Combating Global Corruption Act","description":"The Combating Global Corruption Act presents an imperfect but useful opportunity to rebuild the U.S. government's anti-corruption practices.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Promises and Pitfalls of the \u201cU.S. Combating Global Corruption Act","og_description":"The Combating Global Corruption Act presents an imperfect but useful opportunity to rebuild the U.S. government's anti-corruption practices.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/","og_site_name":"Just Security","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JSBlog\/","article_published_time":"2025-12-09T13:51:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-12-09T16:50:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1280,"url":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/GettyImages-858343628.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Schuyler Miller, Adam Keith","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Promises and Pitfalls of the \u201cU.S. Combating Global Corruption Act","twitter_description":"The Combating Global Corruption Act presents an imperfect but useful opportunity to rebuild the U.S. government's anti-corruption practices.","twitter_creator":"@just_security","twitter_site":"@just_security","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Schuyler Miller, Adam Keith","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/"},"author":{"name":"Schuyler Miller","@id":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/#\/schema\/person\/9b0b1dba7ec01b850abd35687e773f6c"},"headline":"Global Corruption, Local Hypocrisy: The Promises and Pitfalls of the U.S. Combating Global Corruption Act","datePublished":"2025-12-09T13:51:13+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-09T16:50:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/"},"wordCount":2451,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/GettyImages-858343628.jpg?fit=1920%2C1280&ssl=1","keywords":["Congress","Corruption","Democracy","Diplomacy","Rule of Law","When Guardrails Erode: An Anti\u2011Corruption Series"],"articleSection":["Congress","Democracy & Rule of Law","Democratic Backsliding & Solutions","Diplomacy","International and Foreign","International Justice","Rule of Law"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/","name":"Promises and Pitfalls of the \u201cU.S. Combating Global Corruption Act","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/GettyImages-858343628.jpg?fit=1920%2C1280&ssl=1","datePublished":"2025-12-09T13:51:13+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-09T16:50:30+00:00","description":"The Combating Global Corruption Act presents an imperfect but useful opportunity to rebuild the U.S. government's anti-corruption practices.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/GettyImages-858343628.jpg?fit=1920%2C1280&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/GettyImages-858343628.jpg?fit=1920%2C1280&ssl=1","width":1920,"height":1280,"caption":"The Department of State in Washington, D.C. (via Getty Images)"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/126467\/global-corruption-local-hypocrisy-corruption-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Global Corruption, Local Hypocrisy: The Promises and Pitfalls of the U.S. Combating Global Corruption Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/","name":"Just Security","description":"A Forum on Law, Rights, and U.S. National Security","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/#organization","name":"Just Security","url":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/just-security-logo-wordmark-font2.png?fit=5371%2C1757&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/just-security-logo-wordmark-font2.png?fit=5371%2C1757&ssl=1","width":5371,"height":1757,"caption":"Just Security"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JSBlog\/","https:\/\/x.com\/just_security","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/just-security-linkedin\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/justsecurityforum\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@JustSecurityForum","https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/justsecurity.org"],"description":"Just Security is an editorially independent, non-partisan, daily digital law and policy journal that elevates the discourse on national security, democracy and the rule of law, and rights. We publish rigorous, expert analysis and informational resources on the issues that matter most. Our goals are to inform and empower decision-makers with high-quality analysis, foster informed dialogue on challenging issues, and remain accessible to our global audience. Just Security is an essential resource for those shaping a just and secure world. Just Security is based at the Reiss Center on Law and Security at New York University School of Law.","email":"info@justsecurity.org","legalName":"Just Security"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/#\/schema\/person\/9b0b1dba7ec01b850abd35687e773f6c","name":"Schuyler Miller","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/107fc67fbe4c3ed7a444d1ad66379051","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5b780fe18e391c5ed9090431c427c5dbd48f71179d58ddc82a548fb8b84a9cdf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5b780fe18e391c5ed9090431c427c5dbd48f71179d58ddc82a548fb8b84a9cdf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Schuyler Miller"},"description":"Schuyler Miller (LinkedIn\u00a0\u2013\u00a0\u00a0Substack) was career civil servant in the U.S. State Department before being laid off in September 2025. He most recently served as a Policy Advisor for the State Department's Coordinator on Global Anti-Corruption. As a Presidential Management Fellow (PMF), he held roles in the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs's Office of Knowledge Management and Office of Global Programs and Policy, as well as the U.S. Agency for International Development's Anti-Corruption Task Force and Center of Excellence on Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance. Before his time in government, he worked for the National Endowment for Democracy\u2019s World Movement for Democracy. He received his MSc in International Politics as a Mitchell Scholar at Trinity College Dublin and a BA in Government and Foreign Affairs with honors from the University of Virginia.","url":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/author\/millerschuyler\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/GettyImages-858343628.jpg?fit=1920%2C1280&ssl=1","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5gGh3-wTN","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126467","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3436"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=126467"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126467\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":126720,"href":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126467\/revisions\/126720"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/126677"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=126467"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=126467"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=126467"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=126467"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}